Thoughts on PURA 17.007(c)
With initial comments in project 47343 filed yesterday, I have been reading them with interest. I also read the story (link below) and have some thoughts to share.
While some may make the argument that all customer protections for which a REP is not reimbursed could be called into question by the language found in PURA 17.007(c), I would note that the other language in PURA 39.101 requires the extreme weather protections and that the rules maintain the same level of protections that existed prior to deregulation. On that note, I would urge all parties to remember to read all provisions of PURA.